Even though it had already been proven, "government scientists" have now concluded a study confirming the microbes in the Gulf of Mexico have been eating the oil without having the detrimental effect of depleting the oxygen levels in the water.
The concern there is if that was happening, with could create what are called "dead zones," where fish would perish because of lack of oxygen.
This wouldn't have even have had to been done except some Democrat senators looking for an issue, along with so-called professors, who were environmental extremists, insisted the assertion by a government agency that about 75 percent of the oil had already evaporated, dispersed or was eaten by microbes.
Two extremely unreliable and unprovable studies were thrown out to confuse the issue, saying they had discovered a gigantic oil plume in the Gulf.
For some reason these "researchers" didn't choose to reveal the presence of this giant, invisible plume until about two months later, or after the report they didn't approve of, and which didn't fit the narrative they wanted.
Data for the latest study was conducted by nine private and government research ships across 419 different locations.
The Gulf has the strong ability to cleanse itself. That's not what the environmental extremists want to here.
Corexit, the dispersant used to help break up the oil, seemed to have helped, but the alleged discovery of a new microbe which consumes the oil leaves it unclear at this time which did the most work in helping to remove the oil.
Showing posts with label Oil Plume. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oil Plume. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Giant BP (NYSE:BP) Oil Plume Exposed for Hoax it Was
The story of the 21-mile long oil plume, which was allegedly also 65 stories high and a mile wide, keeps on getting better. We asked the question of whether or not it was a hoax on Friday, August 20, and it increasingly looks like it was.
Of course it's being spun a different way this time around, with other scientists saying a "newly discovered fast-eating species of microbes" have leveled the giant skyscraper oil plume.
The original plume was said to be invisible by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts. We won't be listening to their nonsense any longer, as they've lost all credibility.
Even on Friday they said the oil was still out there and the ocean currents had swept it away. Now they're getting in bed with the new story saying it complements their original fairy tale.
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution also said it didn't seem the organisms were eating the oil very quickly either, contradicting today's story.
The New York Times and Washington Post jumped on this story, and we said at that time it's one of the reasons they're declining so much, as it's the story they wanted to hear, rather than actual news.
Once the "scientists" understood the dilemma of having the size of oil plume in the ocean and no one able to find it, the next story had to be created of a new species of microbe that operate at cooler temperatures than previously known.
It's not that something like that couldn't be discovered, but having a different set of scientists create a story which both parties agree "complement" one another is suspicious at best; just as the original story was in its overreach.
Take into consideration the original story was asserted on the day of the House subcommittee hearing on the oil spill, even though Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution said they had made the discovery two months before.
Either they held back the information, created it for Democrat Ed Markey, who heads the committee, in order to pressure the leader of NOAA to capitulate in his original estimate that 75 percent of the oil had left the Gulf, which it indeed has, if not more now.
Markey savaged the NOAA lead scientist based on this faulty information and what could have been a hoax from the beginning.
The bottom line is, as originally stated, the oil has for the most part, been taken care of by the Gulf itself. That seems to trouble the fairy tale narrative some of these so-called scientists created for what appears to be a private agenda.
Read the original reports here and here.
Of course it's being spun a different way this time around, with other scientists saying a "newly discovered fast-eating species of microbes" have leveled the giant skyscraper oil plume.
The original plume was said to be invisible by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts. We won't be listening to their nonsense any longer, as they've lost all credibility.
Even on Friday they said the oil was still out there and the ocean currents had swept it away. Now they're getting in bed with the new story saying it complements their original fairy tale.
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution also said it didn't seem the organisms were eating the oil very quickly either, contradicting today's story.
The New York Times and Washington Post jumped on this story, and we said at that time it's one of the reasons they're declining so much, as it's the story they wanted to hear, rather than actual news.
Once the "scientists" understood the dilemma of having the size of oil plume in the ocean and no one able to find it, the next story had to be created of a new species of microbe that operate at cooler temperatures than previously known.
It's not that something like that couldn't be discovered, but having a different set of scientists create a story which both parties agree "complement" one another is suspicious at best; just as the original story was in its overreach.
Take into consideration the original story was asserted on the day of the House subcommittee hearing on the oil spill, even though Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution said they had made the discovery two months before.
Either they held back the information, created it for Democrat Ed Markey, who heads the committee, in order to pressure the leader of NOAA to capitulate in his original estimate that 75 percent of the oil had left the Gulf, which it indeed has, if not more now.
Markey savaged the NOAA lead scientist based on this faulty information and what could have been a hoax from the beginning.
The bottom line is, as originally stated, the oil has for the most part, been taken care of by the Gulf itself. That seems to trouble the fairy tale narrative some of these so-called scientists created for what appears to be a private agenda.
Read the original reports here and here.
Friday, August 20, 2010
21-Mile Plume from BP (NYSE:BP) Oil Spill Based on 2-month Old Data
Is 21-mile Oil Plume a Hoax?
Incredibly, the fading New York Times and Washington Post jumped all over the alleged 21-mile long oil plume, identified by the Times as "new research," and the Post as "evidence" of the oil still lingering in the Gulf or some unknown location in the vast seas.
The problem is, this "evidence" was from two months ago, and was by no means new, as the Times asserts, and isn't considered evidence, as the Post asserts, even by the "academic" scientists proffering the information.
Funny how they just came out with this new evidence two months after the fact. And of course it is an "invisible" plume, something that can't be confirmed by the naked eye of human beings. Convenient isn't it?
This alleged discovery was made by Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts. They evidently decided to keep the discovery of the 21-mile long plume, also described as 65 stories high and over a mile wide, secret from everyone else until Thursday, August 19.
Oh yes, and it somehow happened to coincide with a House subcommittee hearing on the oil spill. Amazing timing!
There are enormous questions about the theory these academic scientists are saying, the biggest being the question of how the oil could have got to where it was said to have created the plume.
Somehow a miracle seems to have occurred, with the oil no longer floating as has been proven in the past, but it defied its normal behavior and stopped about halfway up to the surface and lingered there in an enormous, but completely clear and invisible way. It's a miracle?
So how are the scientists at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution covering their rear-ends with this? While still making the assertion the oil is still out there, they can no longer say where, as it has been taken away by the "ocean currents." Really, they said that.
With a serious scientific face, they than conclude that more than likely it has moved on to a different location. You just can't make this kind of stuff up.
So this invisible oil plume which is completely acting different than proven behavior of oil floating to the surface, which is 21 miles long and as tall as a 65 story building, has now disappeared (laughter in the background).
How convenient they waited for two months to release their information at the hearing.
So why did the idea of a gigantic oil plume which can't be traced or seen, and which acts completely different than oil in the past, defying the physics of it? It's all to do with the warm Gulf waters which naturally create ideal conditions for oil-eating microbes.
They had to destroy the idea that the microbes have eaten most of the oil, so they have this unprecedented behavior of oil not going to the surface as usual, but somehow stopping in the colder waters of the Gulf.
That's important to their narrative because then they can then say the oil can't be consumed at the pace suggested by the report released which said up to 75 percent of the oil was gone from the Gulf by natural means, mostly from evaporation and microbes eating it.
That also takes care of the evaporation reality as well. If the oil doesn't reach the surface, it can't evaporate. Can it?
In case you think I'm an apologist for the U.S. government in most matters, I'm not, but there's an agenda here, and I'll get to it in a moment.
But for "academic" scientists to act as if some type of miracle has happened with the Gulf oil which defies all the normal behavior and characteristics of an oil spill, is borderline religion, as you have to must have a lot of faith and be naive to believe this outrageous yarn.
So what is this all about, and why has this information miraculously come to the public eye at the hearing today? It's all about money. Period!
Do some research on universities to see where the money is going. Remember not long ago when some departments at Berkeley attacked others because BP had granted them money? Do you think it was because they were truly outraged? No. Universities are hurting, and they're looking for money to continue their operations, and believe it when I say science departments and related areas are included.
This is why almost every scientist quoted in the two articles said the government figures were too "optimistic." They had been viewing the oil spill as a great opportunity to generate some funding for specific departments, and the report from the government blew their little agendas to bits.
There is nothing more to this. Read the articles closely and dissect what they're saying. It's nonsense and gibberish. There's proof of nothing other than the possible foundation for a science fiction novel.
No proof is evident that these alleged plumes continue to exist, and its convenient to assert that in order to generate funding so these organizations and universities can garner taxpayer dollars in order to protect us from the great, invisible oil monster hiding in the deep blue sea.
Incredibly, the fading New York Times and Washington Post jumped all over the alleged 21-mile long oil plume, identified by the Times as "new research," and the Post as "evidence" of the oil still lingering in the Gulf or some unknown location in the vast seas.
The problem is, this "evidence" was from two months ago, and was by no means new, as the Times asserts, and isn't considered evidence, as the Post asserts, even by the "academic" scientists proffering the information.
Funny how they just came out with this new evidence two months after the fact. And of course it is an "invisible" plume, something that can't be confirmed by the naked eye of human beings. Convenient isn't it?
This alleged discovery was made by Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts. They evidently decided to keep the discovery of the 21-mile long plume, also described as 65 stories high and over a mile wide, secret from everyone else until Thursday, August 19.
Oh yes, and it somehow happened to coincide with a House subcommittee hearing on the oil spill. Amazing timing!
There are enormous questions about the theory these academic scientists are saying, the biggest being the question of how the oil could have got to where it was said to have created the plume.
Somehow a miracle seems to have occurred, with the oil no longer floating as has been proven in the past, but it defied its normal behavior and stopped about halfway up to the surface and lingered there in an enormous, but completely clear and invisible way. It's a miracle?
So how are the scientists at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution covering their rear-ends with this? While still making the assertion the oil is still out there, they can no longer say where, as it has been taken away by the "ocean currents." Really, they said that.
With a serious scientific face, they than conclude that more than likely it has moved on to a different location. You just can't make this kind of stuff up.
So this invisible oil plume which is completely acting different than proven behavior of oil floating to the surface, which is 21 miles long and as tall as a 65 story building, has now disappeared (laughter in the background).
How convenient they waited for two months to release their information at the hearing.
So why did the idea of a gigantic oil plume which can't be traced or seen, and which acts completely different than oil in the past, defying the physics of it? It's all to do with the warm Gulf waters which naturally create ideal conditions for oil-eating microbes.
They had to destroy the idea that the microbes have eaten most of the oil, so they have this unprecedented behavior of oil not going to the surface as usual, but somehow stopping in the colder waters of the Gulf.
That's important to their narrative because then they can then say the oil can't be consumed at the pace suggested by the report released which said up to 75 percent of the oil was gone from the Gulf by natural means, mostly from evaporation and microbes eating it.
That also takes care of the evaporation reality as well. If the oil doesn't reach the surface, it can't evaporate. Can it?
In case you think I'm an apologist for the U.S. government in most matters, I'm not, but there's an agenda here, and I'll get to it in a moment.
But for "academic" scientists to act as if some type of miracle has happened with the Gulf oil which defies all the normal behavior and characteristics of an oil spill, is borderline religion, as you have to must have a lot of faith and be naive to believe this outrageous yarn.
So what is this all about, and why has this information miraculously come to the public eye at the hearing today? It's all about money. Period!
Do some research on universities to see where the money is going. Remember not long ago when some departments at Berkeley attacked others because BP had granted them money? Do you think it was because they were truly outraged? No. Universities are hurting, and they're looking for money to continue their operations, and believe it when I say science departments and related areas are included.
This is why almost every scientist quoted in the two articles said the government figures were too "optimistic." They had been viewing the oil spill as a great opportunity to generate some funding for specific departments, and the report from the government blew their little agendas to bits.
There is nothing more to this. Read the articles closely and dissect what they're saying. It's nonsense and gibberish. There's proof of nothing other than the possible foundation for a science fiction novel.
No proof is evident that these alleged plumes continue to exist, and its convenient to assert that in order to generate funding so these organizations and universities can garner taxpayer dollars in order to protect us from the great, invisible oil monster hiding in the deep blue sea.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)