Democrats, led by Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey, are attempting to change the narrative of the damages associated with the Gulf oil spill by strong-arming National Oceanographic Administration scientist Bill Lehr into changing the conclusions of his report that revealed the Gulf of Mexico incurred far less damage than thought, and had in fact cleaned itself up very well, without the help of the U.S. government.
The Gulf of Mexico's healing properties evidently outrages the Democrats, who don't want that politically incorrect body of water contradicting their agenda.
What Markey and the Democrats are going to try to due is get the data from the report from Lehr submitted to peer review, and then put in place those performing the so-called peer review to puppet what they want them to say.
The report accurately depicted the fact that the oil had evaporated and bacteria in the Gulf were flourishing from the increased amount of oil and were eating it very quickly.
Markey, who from past comments in unrelated matters, seems to have deeply rooted psychological problems, harassed and tormented Lehr as he abused his power over his outrage that the report didn't fit into his preconceived notions.
Markey is among those that continue to call the British liars over the alleged connection to the release of the Lockerbie bomber, which everyone in the British government, present and past, have said there is no connection to.
That has also outraged the volatile Markey, who doesn't like to be contradicted when he's creating his fairy tales.
The Democrats and Markey seem to be so obsessed with the good news of the report, that they're not going to stop until they get someone, somewhere to say the oil is still devastating the Gulf, and there is far more remaining than the report from Lehr states.
No comments:
Post a Comment