Officials from Gulf states continue to hammer home truth about the effects of oil from the BP (NYSE:BP) spill, and that is that every test done on seafood from the Guld has revealed there's absolutely no oil tainting the test subjects.
Those with agendas are attempting to cloud and confuse the matter by contending they continue to find oil strewn around the Gulf of Mexico, implying the food chain has to be infected and tainted by oil. But when officials go to the alleged areas with huge swaths of oil, they find no proof that there was any in the area.
This is of course attributed to weather patterns and other fictitious assertions in order to keep the lies alive.
The agenda is fisherman and others allegedly harmed by the oil spill are seeking to be compensated for damages, and the more they can prove they were damaged the more money they'll be paid.
No matter. There is absolutely no proof any Gulf seafood is contaminated or tainted, and it can be eaten with full confidence.
BP has committed $20 million to continue comprehensive testing and marketing to get the word out on the safe food that can be consumed from the Gulf.
Showing posts with label BP Advertising. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BP Advertising. Show all posts
Thursday, October 28, 2010
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
BP (NYSE:BP) Spends Millions on Google Advertising: That's a Story?
For some reason illegally obtained documents by Advertising Age from an internal Google (Nasdaq:GOOG) source saying BP (NYSE:BP) spent millions on advertising with Google is supposed to be a story.
It's already been known for a couple of weeks, at least, that BP spent millions in advertising, including with Google. Even then it wasn't a story, and it's even less of a story today.
BP was doing some brand advertising, and with Google companies spend money to get their ads placed in the search engine results pages. Hundreds of thousands of companies do this every day. How is this relevant to anything?
I've had BP ads on a number of my news blogs for weeks. So the pathetic Ad Age, acting as if they're some big news organization that has broken a story because they had someone improperly pass on private company information to them that everyone already knew about in general, makes them look ridiculous and petty.
The only person who'll suffer for this is the unethical individual who wrongly provided the information to the marketing business.
No one cares if BP is advertising or not.
It's already been known for a couple of weeks, at least, that BP spent millions in advertising, including with Google. Even then it wasn't a story, and it's even less of a story today.
BP was doing some brand advertising, and with Google companies spend money to get their ads placed in the search engine results pages. Hundreds of thousands of companies do this every day. How is this relevant to anything?
I've had BP ads on a number of my news blogs for weeks. So the pathetic Ad Age, acting as if they're some big news organization that has broken a story because they had someone improperly pass on private company information to them that everyone already knew about in general, makes them look ridiculous and petty.
The only person who'll suffer for this is the unethical individual who wrongly provided the information to the marketing business.
No one cares if BP is advertising or not.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)